首页> 外文OA文献 >Predictive Validity and Cut-Off Scores in Four Diagnostic Tests for Falls – A Study in Frail Older People at Home
【2h】

Predictive Validity and Cut-Off Scores in Four Diagnostic Tests for Falls – A Study in Frail Older People at Home

机译:四次跌倒诊断测试的预测有效性和截止分数 - 对家庭中体弱老人的研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

No study has investigated the predictive validity and cut-off scores in diagnostic tests for falls used in in-home assessment in frail older people. The objective was to investigate the predictive validity for falls in the Downton Fall Risk Index (DFRI), Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Romberg test (RT) used in in-home assessment of frail older people (65+ years). Data on the diagnostic tests were collected at baseline N = 153) and fall frequency were collected at six- and twelve-month follow-ups. The optimal cut-offs were 3 p in DFRI and 12 s in TUG. However, the validity indexes were generally low and only 40–50% were correctly classified. The RT showed low sensitivity. To increase the predictive validity for falls in this context, the use of DFRI and/or TUG as a part of a comprehensive fall-risk assessment tool, should be investigated in future studies
机译:没有研究调查脆弱的老年人在家庭评估中使用的跌倒诊断测试的预测有效性和临界值。目的是研究唐纳德跌倒风险指数(DFRI),定时出门(TUG)和Romberg测验(RT)在衰弱老年人(65岁以上)的家庭评估中对跌倒的预测有效性。在基线N = 153时收集诊断测试的数据,并在6个月和12个月的随访中收集跌倒频率。 DFRI的最佳临界值为3 p,TUG的最佳临界值为12 s。但是,有效性指标通常很低,只有40%到50%被正确分类。 RT显示低灵敏度。为了在这种情况下提高跌倒的预测有效性,应在以后的研究中研究使用DFRI和/或TUG作为综合跌倒风险评估工具的一部分

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号